Search for: "U.S. v. Mark" Results 1801 - 1820 of 11,354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2019, 12:32 am by Brian Craig
In affirming a district court’s dismissal because use of the marks constituted nominative fair use, the appeals court concluded that Applied’s service was not readily identifiable without use of the trademarks, the seminar creators used only so much of the trademarks as was reasonably necessary, and use of the trademarks did not suggest sponsorship or endorsement (Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. [read post]
More from our authors: Special Protection of Trade Marks with a Reputation under European Union Law by Michal Bohaczewski€ 136 [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm by cdw
The next edition  has two really notable opinions, Mark Breakiron v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:17 am by Mark Engstrom
Mark EngstromIn a lawsuit involving the alleged infringement of an Exmark patent that described a lawn mower with improved flow-control baffles, a federal district court erroneously based its summary judgment finding of no invalidity solely on the fact that the patent claim at issue had survived multiple reexaminations, the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 7:40 am by Orin Kerr
” Skinner, 489 U.S. at 616 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” For Capitol Media Services (via the Arizona Capitol Times), Howard Fischer reports that “Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich is asking the U.S. [read post]