Search for: "U.S. v. Promin"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 2,513
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
The ruling in Hamdan v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:59 am
See, for example, Campbell v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:16 am
She worked for many years in a prominent City firm, specialising in property finance and development transactions, and now regularly manages the firm’s largest and most active developer clients, whilst retaining and expertise in property finance. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am
To remedy the violation, we follow the Supreme Court’s approach in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
The U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 7:12 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 10:55 am
A pretty prominent place. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm
With respect to monopoly power, the potential case of FTC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm
Supreme Court decided by 6-3 in Timmons v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm
Texaco, Inc.(2d Cir. 1994) is an opinion that will likely feature prominently in the prior art plaintiffs’ briefing. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
On appeal, the Circuit Court found that the District Court’s decision was inconsistent with a Supreme Court Judgement in Qualitex Co. v Jacobson Products Co. 514 U.S. 159, 162 (1995) and that the previous court was incorrect because Louboutin’s red soles have the requisite "distinctiveness" to merit trade mark protection. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
On appeal, the Circuit Court found that the District Court’s decision was inconsistent with a Supreme Court Judgement in Qualitex Co. v Jacobson Products Co. 514 U.S. 159, 162 (1995) and that the previous court was incorrect because Louboutin’s red soles have the requisite "distinctiveness" to merit trade mark protection. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:44 am
By Tyler Baker and Ted Max On September 5, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited and highly anticipated decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:12 am
” Zauderer, 471 U.S. at 651. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:06 am
Jack Townsend, Airline Pilot Shot Down at Sentencing: Readers may recall that airline pilots have figured prominently in trying to evade taxes. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
if it is used so consistently and prominently by a particular designer that it becomes a symbol, “the primary significance” of which is “to identify the source of the product rather than the product itself. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
In 2008, Louboutin registered his red lacquered outsole with the United States Patent and Trademark Office as a design mark (U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:10 pm
Militello v. [read post]
