Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 7,222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2019, 1:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that Google failed to meet its burden of establishing that Koninklijke Philips’ (Koninklijke’s) patent claims at issue were unpatentable on either of two grounds: 1) anticipation by Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) International Application Publication No. 98/52187 (the Tucker invention), or 2) obviousness over Tucker in view of the prior art. n 2016,… [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 8:07 am
I realized that at least one of my ideas/changes could be patented so I reached out to a patent lawyer in the United States and I now have a patent pending. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
That class includes the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s Trial Practice Guide, and the Manual of Trademark Examining Procedure, and likely includes decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, and OED on which the agency intends to rely for future effect, including ones the USPTO considers “precedential. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:43 am
Dureska Senior Counsel at Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig’s Atlanta office Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig (DBL) scored another victory at the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) for the trademark “INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE CARE SYSTEMS” for, in pertinent part, chiropractic services. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:15 am
Attorney General, Antitrust Division, Makan Delrahim, asking them to “work with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to provide guidance on remedies for infringement of standard-essential patents (SEPs) subject to fair, reasonable... [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:15 am
Attorney General, Antitrust Division, Makan Delrahim, asking them to “work with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to provide guidance on remedies for infringement of standard-essential patents (SEPs) subject to fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) licensing commitments. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:10 pm
Burden of Persuasion to Demonstrate Unpatentability on Petitioner The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to allocate the burdens of persuasion on motions to amend in AIA trial proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 8:44 am
Lavergne, had a duty to disclose material information to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:24 pm
Since 2016, Argentina has already entered into PPH arrangements with Japan, United States, Denmark and all 13 members from PROSUR: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Panama, and the Dominican Republic. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 5:58 am
The decline in patent litigation can mainly be seen in Europe and in the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 11:55 am
The Journal publishes legal scholarship in the areas of patent, trademark, copyright, cyber, privacy, and technology law. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
He also discussed some recent key court decisions, including Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) holding the disparagement clause of the Lanham Act unconstitutional under the First Amendment and paving the way for the mark F.U.C.T. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
Appearing before the Supreme Court were Malcolm Stewart, representing the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and Morgan Chu, representing NantKwest, Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 10:56 am
(Apotex) challenged OSI’s patent by filing a petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR) at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 5:47 am
The patents at issue in this case are United States Patent Nos. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) had, as noted in NantKwest’s reply brief “until now…never even sought, much less been awarded, attorneys’ fees under § 145 in the nearly two centuries since its passage. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
Picasso case (United States District Court for the Northern District of California). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation.Ramos v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) when its employees defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
