Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 13,833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2021, 11:21 pm
In Savea v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 11:21 pm
In Savea v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Wasserman The Supreme Court hears arguments Monday in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 4:37 pm
The confirmation raises the prospect that Prelogar will argue at the Supreme Court on Monday on behalf of the Biden administration in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 2:41 pm
"] From the Plea Agreement filed last week in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 11:34 am
“For these reasons, the Court finds that Trump’s status as President of the United States does not exclude him from the requirements of the forum selection clause in Twitter’s Terms of Service. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
The case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:06 am
Corbett v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
In addition, the trial court stated the California Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Iskanian v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 6:45 am
As noted in an earlier post on this site, the United States Supreme Court granted a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Cassirer v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 1:15 pm
Federal District for the Northern District of California, to an appointment by President Biden to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:25 pm
Today, briefs were filed in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm
For example, the California rule just quoted then provides in a comment that “[t]his rule does not prohibit those activities of a particular lawyer that are protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or by Article I, section 2 of the California Constitution. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:44 am
Brief of Amici Curiae Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas, NCAI, NIGA, and USET in support of Cert Petition Texas’ Cert Opp Reply of petitioners Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Brief amicus curiae of United States in favor of SCOTUS review Texas’ Supplemental brief Texas v Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 5th Circuit Opinion [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
In several major cities and counties, in some territories, perhaps in the whole state of California, and to a small extent in Minnesota, private businesses may not discriminate against patrons based on certain of their political activities. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:41 am
A recent Ninth Circuit decision in Thunder Studios v. [read post]
