Search for: "United States v. Fields" Results 1801 - 1820 of 5,321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2011, 10:04 am by stu@crimapp.com
Many years ago in Whren v United States, 517 US 806 (1996), the United States Supreme Court upheld the use of pretext based traffic stops. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 8:10 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Tuesday’s oral argument is in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6[e][2]). [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:57 am by Jan Baran
For example, contrary to President Barack Obama’s histrionic warning in his State of the Union speech, Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:28 am by Moria Miller
Bibas and Vázquez were among a twelve-member team of pro bono attorneys selected for excellence in litigation in the field of immigration law for their work on Padilla. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm by admin
However valid one may find this argument to be, federalism and the United States Supreme Court allow for this incongruity today. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 11:38 am by Terry Lenamon
However valid one may find this argument to be, federalism and the United States Supreme Court allow for this incongruity today. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
  One such effect was recently discussed in an article in the Financial Post which highlighted that financial abuse amongst seniors by scam artists is on the rise in both the United States and Canada. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-883; Brito v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:52 am by John Stigi
Mar. 19, 2014), the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Boyle, J.) denied lead plaintiff’s class certification motion in a consolidated action alleging claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:39 am by Ilya Somin
United States, which struck down a statute requiring state officials to help enforce a federal gun control law) and it cannot do it circuitously, as with Section 1373. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm by Lisa McElroy
Bennett, follow-ups to last year’s controversial campaign finance decision, Citizens United v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am by Sabina Henneberg
  The United States also showed its support for Ecuador’s democratic progress with visits by U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:48 am by Mark Nieds
This changed on June 21, 2018 when the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]