Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 1801 - 1820 of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2014, 8:19 am by Benjamin Wittes
Adds the New York Times editorial page: There’s no explanation given in the memo for how the United States knew Mr. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by Alina Artunian
In a 1992 case called Quill Corporation v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:55 am by Florian Mueller
Motorola ruling is highly influential, Judge James Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington -- with support from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- has become the pioneer and thought leader in the U.S. with respect to the adjudication of FRAND licensing terms by federal courts through the substantive and procedural decisions has has already made in the Microsoft v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
(“WaMu”) is the former parent holding company of Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu Bank”) and is the lead debtor in the three year old chapter 11 case pending before Judge Mary Walrath in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Court”). [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
(“WaMu”) is the former parent holding company of Washington Mutual Bank (“WaMu Bank”) and is the lead debtor in the three year old chapter 11 case pending before Judge Mary Walrath in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Court”). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am by Dennis Crouch
The focus of the case is location – and, what is meant by an "offer to sell . . . within the United States" under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Salar Atrizadeh
In 2018, the United States Supreme Court addressed this issue in South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:09 pm
The panel members were Mattias Zigann, the presiding judge of the Munich Regional Court, Philip Kerr of Allens Linklaters and Larry Welch, the Senior Director, and Assistant General Patent Counsel at Eli Lilly and Company.Mr Ludwig explained that the question of what relief was appropriate had been highlighted by the very recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in AMGEN INC & ors v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-6096, Hyde v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am by MOTP
 See Dulong, 261 S.W.3d at 894; McFarland, 293 S.W.3d at 763-64 (cases holding creditor could collect debt on account stated where, based on series of transactions reflected on account statements, creditor established that card holder agreed to full amount shown on statements and impliedly promised to pay indebtedness). [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am by Peter Margulies
The Constitution generally does not protect noncitizens abroad who have no previous ties to the United States. [read post]