Search for: "United States v. Johnson"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States, on Wednesday, July 25, 2018, at 4:00 p.m. in Chautauqua’s Hall of Philosophy. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm
The Award recognizes Canadians who have excelled in the practice of law and/or made an outstanding contribution to the law or legal scholarship in the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:12 pm
United States in 2015, Mr. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 6:37 pm
Funk On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0265a.062008/07/22 Justin Parsons v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:26 pm
United States, “A person does not surrender all Fourth Amendment protection by venturing into the public sphere. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Johnson & Johnson, 54 Supp. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Feds for Medical Freedom, 23-60Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
There is a lot in Pickett that merits highlighting, but this paragraph may be my favorite and the most important aspect of the decision (and not just for crack cases, but for all cases):While Booker and § 3553(a) instruct sentencing courts to consider all these "multiple and vague" factors, United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:35 am
United States, 559 U. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:27 am
New York, worked its way up to the United States Supreme Court.read more [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:16 am
Johnson Cnty., 73 U.S. (6 Wall.) 166, 196, 18 L. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
Kevin Johnson analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
