Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 9,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm
In Larry Harmon Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm
In Larry Harmon Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:58 am
” United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:51 am
Said the Court, the high rating position of links to the CTM proprietor’s website could be justified in the light of the earlier mark’s well-known character in the United States; they did not show that EU consumers were familiar with the earlier mark, given that no evidence was provided of its market share, of how intensive, geographically widespread and long-standing its use was, of the investment in its promotion and of how significant a… [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 3:59 am
Wirecard AG v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
Some of the background can be found in an article entitled “Right of Reply: A Comparative Approach” [pdf] by Andras Koltay, who also discusses the position in the United States and Canada. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
The Court ruled, instead, that “all the relevant conduct took place outside the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 3:58 am
” Daimler AG v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 3:43 am
Hov IP II, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:56 am
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Maples v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
“Marriage Equality,” as the New York statute is entitled, has been a hard fought battle.New York’s highest court held that there was no state constitutional right to same-sex marriage in Hernandez v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 2:50 pm
See also United States v Power, unpublished memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, issued January 9, 2023 (Case No. 20-po-331-GLS), 2023 WL 131050, and United States v Robertson, unpublished memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, issued January 9, 2023 (Case No. 22-po-867-GLS), 2023 WL 131051, *12 ("[T]he Court… [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act) Simmons v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The best way to do this is through the extensive literature on state capacity and development, much of it new since Ackerman’s original efforts, to establish a legally plausible baseline for marking out later informal constitutional changes. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:09 am
The Board had ruled that Petitioner Australian Therapeutic lacked standing because it had agreed not to use or register the mark NAKED for condoms in the United States, and further had agreed that Respondent could use and register the mark, and so Australian did not have a real interest in this proceeding or a reasonable basis for its belief of damage. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 10:42 am
” A recent case from the United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that a trade name can be “distinct” when it incorporates two generic terms which are not typically linked together. [read post]
