Search for: "United States v. May" Results 1801 - 1820 of 49,417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 9:51 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
With that in mind, we may need to pay attention and give some thought to: United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:35 am by Conor McEvily
Today’s petition of the day is: Title: United States and California v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:53 pm by The Federalist Society
 The question in the case is whether, under the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV and the dormant Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, a state may preclude citizens of other states from enjoying the same right of access to public records that the state affords its own citizens.To discuss the case, we have Christopher Green, who is a professor at the University of Mississippi School of Law  and currently… [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:53 pm by The Federalist Society
 The question in the case is whether, under the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV and the dormant Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, a state may preclude citizens of other states from enjoying the same right of access to public records that the state affords its own citizens.To discuss the case, we have Christopher Green, who is a professor at the University of Mississippi School of Law  and currently… [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 2:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) So the Ninth Circuit holds today in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:54 pm
The POUM Clause provides that the legislature may not mandate a new activity or increased level of activity of any unit of local government (such as a school district) unless the State pays the unit of local government for any associated increased costs. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:02 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The post The Sackett Oral Argument and the Problem of Defining "Waters of the United States" appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Poppy Weston-Davies
Arizona, et al., Petitioners v United States The Court decided by five votes to three that three of four provisions inArizona’s Senate Bill 1070 were null. [read post]