Search for: "United States v. Morales" Results 1801 - 1820 of 3,618
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999)).U.S. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Now it’s possible to look at when people stopped saying “the United States are” and said “the United States is” by copying the contents of an entire library: a nonexpressive use. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In addition, the Wife provided the solace and moral support "necessary to sustain [the Husband] in coping with the vicissitudes of life outside the home'" (Price v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 8:35 am by Steve Lubet
   “The Ten Commandments,” says the Act, “are an important component of the moral foundation of the laws and legal system of the United States of American and of the State of Arkansas” and represent “a philosophy . . . that God has ordained civil government and has delegated limited authority to civil government. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
   It did not do so, for example, in its most recent ruling in a major gay rights case — the 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien,… [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681, 684-85 (7th Cir. 2010). [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am by Ben
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:27 pm
Bernard stated that he was unaware whether this data was available or had been analyzed. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
United States Georgia’s Supreme Court has ruled against a woman who claimed she was stalked online. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 8:43 am by Jim Singer
A recent United States Supreme Court decision is likely to affect the way that parties approach trademark opposition proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:40 am by Jeff Redding
The middle of the United States continues to generate some of the most radical experiments in (mis)governance in recent American history. [read post]