Search for: "V Johnson" Results 1801 - 1820 of 11,080
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2020, 6:53 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972), así como también la determinación en Johnson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
”  It was assumed that such adaptation would invoke Article V at the national level. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Hamm
The petitions of the week are below the jump: Johnson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Deciding that the plain language of the disputed language in the CBA "merely provides for minimum staffing on particular shifts," the Appellate Division said it agreed with Supreme Court that this provision was not a job security provision and "the stringent test in Johnson City Professional Firefighters Local 921 (Village of Johnson City), 18 NY3d at 32, does not apply" in this instance.The Appellate Division found that the disputed provision,… [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Deciding that the plain language of the disputed language in the CBA "merely provides for minimum staffing on particular shifts," the Appellate Division said it agreed with Supreme Court that this provision was not a job security provision and "the stringent test in Johnson City Professional Firefighters Local 921 (Village of Johnson City), 18 NY3d at 32, does not apply" in this instance.The Appellate Division found that the disputed provision,… [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 5:28 am by Daniel Klapper
Women are just trying to survive this crisis,” said acting President and CEO of Planned Parenthood, Alexis McGill Johnson. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Even post-Civil War and post-Brown v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court was petitioned recently to take up Higginson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:42 am by Amy Howe
In a short statement joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sotomayor explained that Patrick’s case involved the same question on which she had previously dissented from the denial of review: whether defendants sentenced under mandatory sentencing guidelines can rely on the court’s 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 2:02 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit (Carney, Wesley, and Menashi) affirms, and the case now proceeds to trial.The law was clear for a case like this because the Second Circuit held in Johnson v. [read post]