Search for: "Washington v. Texas" Results 1801 - 1820 of 3,036
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
This one is on behalf of the bloggers at SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court of Texas Blog, How Appealing, InstaPundit, and Power Line (3/4 of the bloggers there), in SEIU v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am by Gritsforbreakfast
According to the civil liberties group:The government relies on a 1979 case, Smith v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 4:44 pm by Arina Shulga
In Texas, members can expand or restrict fiduciary duties, but it is not clear which exactly duties may be restricted. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
On Wednesday, the Court will hear oral arguments in Town of Greece v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:49 pm by Amy Howe
  Like Sotomayor, he expressed doubts about whether this case was any different from Washington v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am by Amy Howe
The editorial board of The Washington Times weighs in on Arab Bank v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Bursch, and Detroit lawyer George Washington in the affirmative action case of Schuette -v- Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The other was the 1982 decision in Washington v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 2:30 pm by Joe Patrice
[Forbes] * A Texas judge ordered a teen to move back in with a sex offender. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:40 pm by Florian Mueller
Robart in Seattle (Western District of Washington) pioneered this field with his 207-page rate-setting opinion in Microsoft v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Texas in determining that Virginia’s “crimes against nature” statute is not facially unconstitutional or unconstitutional as applied to an adult male’s solicitation of a minor female, outside the home, to perform oral sodomy. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 3:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Texas previously was obliged to get such approval under the 1965 Voting Rights Act, but that regime ended with the Supreme Court’s ruling in June in Shelby County v. [read post]