Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 6,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2022, 11:57 am
We have to defend it, protect it, stand up for it, each and every one of us. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 12:28 pm
Her article, published in the North Carolina Law Review in January 2007, says that pro se defendants don't do significantly worse than defendants who are represented by lawyers -- and in some respects they do better. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:45 am
And don't think for a second that we can't see the jurors shifting about in their seats, desperate to get out of the box. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 12:59 pm
I don't get this move. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:19 am
[Maybe so if the written findings don’t match the oral findings.] [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 11:40 pm
At this point I don't want to elaborate on the "anti-fragmentation" part of the decision, but suffice it to say that app developers like me are against fragmentation, so we wouldn't necessarily agree to the full extent with the EUGC's dismissal of Google's anti-fragmentation arguments. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 am
You don't need to slam Judge Cooke for her "power play," whatever that means. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
I don't have great confidence that our nation will meet that challenge. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
Not all facts are relevant to prove a point, and some facts simply don't matter, given what is at issue. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 10:19 am
or a sales representative was involved with the marketing of the prescription medical product that the plaintiff used, and (2) back in state court the same plaintiff later denies (or admits having no evidence) that these same parties were involved.We don’t think that vacatur of remand orders under the Barlow rationale will ever become a routine occurrence, but we do believe that some plaintiffs, emboldened by §1447(d) preventing any review of their shenanigans,… [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:48 pm
It said: "Look, I don't know if you're a US citizen, and I don't need or want to know; it won't affect my sentence. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:36 pm
And one thing conservatives don't do is to let the perfect become the enemy of the good. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 5:00 am
We don't like to lose that preemption issue -- heck, we don't like to lose any issue -- but we can live with this.First, McDarby is a New Jersey state appellate court speaking to an issue of federal law. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 2:36 pm
Illegal aliens don't qualify under the definition of "the people" set forth in Verdugo-Urquidez and Heller—not as a matter of common sense or Court precedent. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 5:06 pm
it makes the difference because it provides information perspective that the briefs don't and can't contain.Well, maybe. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 6:15 pm
" I don't think I had been a Lawyer very long when I began to realize this. [read post]
17 May 2021, 7:23 am
And I don't think you can fix MDY without fixing Vernor. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:56 pm
We don’t believe his approach is the most effective to keep Dallas secure, especially in its most vulnerable communities.The editorial board would like to pretend they support bail reform, just not John Creuzot's brand. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:18 am
In light of past underenforcement, it's obvious that competition "watchdogs" don't just want to wave this $69 billion purchase of a major game maker by one of the largest Big Tech players through: they must take a closer look. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:41 am
(When Dershowitz became an expert on Italian law, I don't know.) [read post]
