Search for: "Weeks v. United States" Results 1801 - 1820 of 19,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2022, 5:55 am by Ximena Casas Isaza
Wade, the case drew all eyes to reproductive rights issues in the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am by NARF
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act) Simmons v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 8:14 am
").SB 260 will also violate the "Dormant Commerce Clause" of the United States Constitution. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm by Anna Bower
United States Servicemen’s Fund and Bogan v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 11:16 am by Christopher G. Hill
  The case that I will be discussing in this post is Royal Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”This conception of clemency is continuous with a line of cases going back to the first United States Supreme Court case on clemency in 1833.That case, United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 1:26 am by Frank Cranmer
Church and State On Friday, the House of Commons Library published a research briefing on The relationship between church and state in the United Kingdom written by David Torrance. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:47 pm by Dan Flynn
The United States v Paul Kruse trial in Austin, TX, has adjourned for the weekend. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm by Kalvis Golde
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: Arrington v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:24 am by Ashley Morgan
The LCD states the following: “Evaluation of the clinical literature indicates that studies comparing the efficacy of CTPs to alternative wound care approaches with patients’ autologous skin are limited in number, apply mainly to generally healthy patients, and examine only a small portion of the CTP products available in the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]