Search for: "X, Y "
Results 1801 - 1820
of 4,307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2014, 4:02 am
Cecile Martin A few months after the European Court of Justice ruled on May 13, 2014 that search engines are considered personal data controllers under the EU Data Protection Directive of 1995 and, as such, should provide data subjects with a right to be forgotten, a French Tribunal enforced this principle in X & Y v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 11:27 am
We may not know just when the sum (x + y - z) will start to get smaller, because we do not know the exact numbers of its individual components, which change from day to day. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 2:49 pm
., letting all the plaintiffs injured in X way or deceived in Y fashion go to trial together, an putting the W and/or Z plaintiffs on a different track? [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
Perhaps there has been some misunderstanding here, so I shall set out my thoughts from the beginning.As I stated above, the usual situation is that a product-by-process claim “X obtained/able by process Y” represents a novel subset of generic X. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:30 am
While Preis begins his piece in the standard manner (“In part I, I argue X and in part II, I contend Y. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 10:36 am
Rumors are like wildfire, and once the gossip spreads that X was raped by Y, the damage to your reputation is building on what may be a daily or even hourly basis. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 12:31 am
The reason is that the EPO interprets, for the purposes of assessing novelty, a claim that states "X obtained by process Y" as a claim to X as such, and will consider such a claim as lacking novelty if X as such is not new. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm
In X and Y (Children: Disclosure of Judgment to Police) [2014] EWHC 278 (Fam), [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported above at p 961) Baker J considered whether his judgment setting out findings and admissions by the father of having inflicted injuries on his child (or other documents within the care proceedings) should be released to the police, the father having made an application for an order prohibiting the release, which would otherwise have been permissible under the FPR… [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:24 pm
You’re insured for your “but for” income during the period of restoration – that is to say, “but for” the unfortunate event, you would have made X dollars, and instead you made Y dollars (or lost money). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 10:21 am
Appellant argues that the law in the Ninth Circuit is X but that an intervening Supreme Court decision holds Y, so Y's the law, not X. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 12:27 pm
Even if a district judge found that a patent claim term meant “X” to skilled artisans as of the effective patent filing date, the court would still have to construe the term to mean “Y” if the intrinsic evidence established that the patentee intended such a specialized meaning. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:03 pm
The imported item is usually X or Y and there is no middle on which to settle. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 4:43 am
Well, it's knock, knock, 'Justice X forgot his glasses.' And knock, knock, 'Justice Y forgot her coffee.' There I am hopping up and down. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 7:47 am
De la siguiente maneraEje x: año, Eje y, número de ley.Para captar las transiciones que cayeron en "democracia", recapitulamos lo del gráfico de arriba: la 26.000 se había publicado en enero de 2005. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:05 pm
In addition to the slider that lets you scroll up and down to find a page in the deposition, you can now tap on the Page X of Y indication at the top right of a transcript and enter a specific page number to jump right to that page. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 11:42 am
Therefore, thinking, “no one will notice if we do [x, y, or z] … just this one time” is never a safe approach. __________________ For information about my regulatory services: contact For more regulatory law updates follow me on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Visit my Google+ page for more updates: Canadian Competition & Regulatory [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 6:30 am
At the same time, the law firm of X,Y, & Z is representing a number of these same claimants. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:15 am
Basically, Party X adds Party Y to its general liability coverage as an additional insured. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 1:03 pm
Thus, the Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws (1934), offered this illustration: “A, domiciled in state X, validly marries B and C in X. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:13 pm
In other words, if X doesn't happen, Y won't happen. [read post]
