Search for: "ABOVE THE LAW AND LATERAL LINK"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 3,063
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2022, 12:46 am
, under Dutch law the court could assume the unlawful conduct caused the damage unless the defendant could prove otherwise. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:36 am
" That seems like it is already the case; yesterday's LA Times has a story that discusses Gingrich's suggestion (in the white paper linked to above) that in some cases he might ignore a Supreme Court ruling. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:01 pm
Among the 2-3 dozen sites affected are Facebook, Gmail and Above the Law. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 8:48 am
In some recent columns (most recently here, with internal links to earlier pieces), I have been writing about the immoral choices that the editors of The Times and others have been making. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 1:18 pm
Therefore Plaintiff’s claim under strict liability cannot be genuinely equivalent to Defendant’s requirements under federal law, and is thus preempted. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:12 pm
As case law continues to demonstrate, certain mobile and website presentations will be held to be enforceable, others will not. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 6:51 am
As mentioned above, the SPC decides (either through judgments or rulings) large numbers of cases yearly, and the SPC responds to an unknown number of requests for instructions (请示), mostly on legal issues, which means that in practice that issues on the same body of law may be determined by different divisions of the SPC or different teams of SPC judges. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
The European Court of Human Rights Information Note (case law 246 December 2020)provides a summary of the case:The case concerns the greenhouse gas emissions from 33 Contracting States, which, in the applicants’ submission, contribute to global warming and result, inter alia, in heatwaves which are affecting the applicants’ living conditions and health.The applicants complain, inter alia, of the failure by these 33 States to comply with their undertakings, in the context of the… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am
Decision R 19/12 was submitted with the letter of 14 January 2015.New oral proceedings were scheduled to take place on 12 November 2015; after a later request of the petitioner, these were postponed to 18 November 2015. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am
Decision R 19/12 was submitted with the letter of 14 January 2015.New oral proceedings were scheduled to take place on 12 November 2015; after a later request of the petitioner, these were postponed to 18 November 2015. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 8:20 pm
” entry linked at the top of this page. is law school still worth it: Nothing has happened to change my perspective (Part I and Part II) so I’d say “yes. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm
§ 230) is one of the most important laws protecting free speech online. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:42 am
Citations converted to hypertext links. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 2:44 pm
The Law 360 article to which I linked above contains a quotation of an interesting statement by a representative of the U.K Information Commissioner’s Office about the question of insurability of GDPR fines. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:20 pm
Congress later excluded independent contractors from the NLRA’s collective bargaining guarantee, putting contractors who engage in union organizing at risk of violating antitrust law. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 7:47 am
The opinion dwells heavily on the various statutory provisions I quoted above. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:54 pm
The same is true with the general telemedicine proposed rule, above. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 2:37 am
” Accordingly, no artist may use copyright law to prevent others from depicting this ecological idea. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 2:48 pm
California’s Fair Chance Act (also known as the Ban-the-Box law) generally prohibits employers from asking applicants about their criminal history until later in the hiring process. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 3:28 pm
One other interesting aspect of the Consent Order in the Dwolla case is that, as the law firm memo to which I linked above notes, it “places significant responsibility for Dwolla’s data security practices and compliance with the order directly on Dwolla’s board of directors. [read post]
