Search for: "Bodie v Bodie" Results 1821 - 1840 of 21,336
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
According to the logic of The Reasoning State, whatever flaw exists in West Virginia v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 3:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
    Veterinary doctor appeals decision from regulatory body In Ontario College of Veterinarians of Ontario v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 3:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
    Veterinary doctor appeals decision from regulatory body In Ontario College of Veterinarians of Ontario v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 11:30 am by Unknown
Netherlands represents the first decision of any UN treaty body to impose positive duties on a state to grant nationality to a child born in its territory who would otherwise be stateless. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 12:16 am by Frank Cranmer
Ilyin and Others v Ukraine (no. 74852/14): about the Kyiv City State Administration’s refusal to register a community of the Unification Church. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Guest Author
   ***  Given the real-life separation between the executive and administrative bodies in our stylized picture, there would be a problem with across-the-board deference to that apparatus, especially on constitutional grounds. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 7:36 am by Chris Sutton
Certain entities are exempt from VCDPA compliance including: Virginia state bodies and agenciesfinancial institutions or data subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)entities or businesses governed by the privacy, security, and breach notification rules under Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) or the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITEACH)non-profit organizationshigher education institutionsCertain… [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 8:08 am by Frank Cranmer
In Aygün v Belgium [2022] ECHR 939 [in French], the applicants’ two sons had been murdered in September 2010 and in February 2014 a neighbour was convicted of their murder. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 8:14 pm
To further put it succinctly, this mandate was reflected even in the judiciary’s judgment in various cases, most significantly in Chang Liang Sang & Ors v Public Prosecutor [1982] 2 MLJ 231:other than in the most exceptional circumstances, a sentence of death should be imposed following a conviction for trafficking, in order to mark the gravity of the offence, to emphasise public disapproval, to serve as a warning to others, to punish the offender and most of all the protect the… [read post]