Search for: "Bush v. United States"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 2,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2019, 8:49 am
But recognizing that the U.S. needed tools to quickly address emerging national security threats that fall short of war, Congress in parallel enacted IEEPA to give the president broad powers to respond to “any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
President Clinton on numerous occasions averred that the United States was not at war. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:16 am
It was evident in this week’s hearing that the United States national security apparatus remains heavily focused upon counterterrorism. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:42 am
But, let’s face it, in an era where technology disruption is generating so many critical and difficult copyright issues, the law relevant to the monkey selfie is pretty straightforward, at least in the United States. [read post]
5 May 2008, 10:36 am
" On Oklahoma State Penitentiary's death row, convicted killer Paris Powell said the day after the decision on Baze v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:23 pm
” On the other side of the balance, the judge noted the government’s interest in detaining those who “actually pose an immediate threat to the national security of the United States during ongoing international conflict” and ensuring [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Trump, the President of the United States, intends to file a motion to dismiss this action on the ground, among others, that the United States Constitution, including the Supremacy Clause contained therein, immunizes the President from being sued in state court while in office. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 3:31 pm
Medellin anyway, taking the decision out of Congress’ hands and placing the United States irrevocably in breach. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
Bush signed the extension into law on July 27, 2006, and, ten days later it was challenged in the District Court. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 1:18 pm
Under the new law, those who may be tried by military commissions are described as "unprivileged enemy belligerents," theoretically a law-of-war term, but here meaning not only individuals who have actually "engaged in hostilities against the United States," but also individuals who have "purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:42 am
Under the new law, those who may be tried by military commissions are described as "unprivileged enemy belligerents," theoretically a law-of-war term, but here meaning not only individuals who have actually "engaged in hostilities against the United States," but also individuals who have "purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
Stated precisely: The United States is the only entity with any ability to exercise its will at Guantánamo. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 4:35 am
Even so, administration officials have continued to promote the idea that the United States should wield its military power early, often and unilaterally to secure its interests around the world. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 10:48 am
" In June 2004, the Supreme Court's Rasul decision held that because the naval base at Guantánamo Bay was under the exclusive control of the United States, the federal habeas corpus statute extended to detainees held there. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:09 am
There was, however, a showdown during the Bush Administration over President Bush’s decision to recess appoint Judge William Pryor to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:22 pm
The American Dreams app for iPhone and iPod Touch is a portable library of primary source documents and audio files related to United States and North American history. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:49 am
The clause says the president “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:25 pm
Of course, given that, in the almost 30 years since a woman first ascended to the United States Supreme Court, we appear to have reached a plateau, with only two women serving at any one time over the past 16 years, perhaps my optimism is misplaced. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:22 pm
Alderman v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
