Search for: "C Brown" Results 1821 - 1840 of 4,667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
See Weil and Brown, Civil Procedure Before Trial (TRG 2012) §8:1537 citing Browne v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:12 am by Wells Bennett
Judge Janice Rogers Brown wrote a concurrence, regarding the detainee’s unsuccessful effort to apply Hamdan v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 12:22 pm by Theodore R. Flo
Judge Brown suggested that, if the CFPB’s structure is constitutional, nothing would prevent Congress from slapping lengthy terms and for-cause removal restrictions on cabinet-level officials. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
The California legislature and Governor Jerry Brown have once again entered the immigration fray. [read post]
It sent a number of employment-related bills to Governor Brown for consideration by his October 11, 2015 deadline to sign or veto the bills. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm by The Complex Litigator
Specifically, appellant alleged that "Schroer and White received amounts grossly disproportionate to the average recovery to the ETF Assessed Class", and asserted that "Nguyen and Brown (members of the Subscriber Class) received 'pay-offs to induce them to sell out the Subscriber Class.'" Slip op., at 20. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 5:18 pm
”  The court cited to the 1999 decision of Browning v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 11:25 am by Bob Ambrogi
 Here was the money quote from the opinion: “Rather than seeing the Avvo ratings for what they are — ‘that and $1.50 will get you a ride on Seattle’s new South Lake Union Streetcar’ — plaintiffs Browne and Wenokur want to make a federal case out of the number assigned to them because (a) it could harm their reputation, (b) it could cost them customers/fees, or (c) it could mislead the lawyer-hiring public into retaining poor lawyers or… [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 11:25 am by Bob Ambrogi
 Here was the money quote from the opinion: “Rather than seeing the Avvo ratings for what they are — ‘that and $1.50 will get you a ride on Seattle’s new South Lake Union Streetcar’ — plaintiffs Browne and Wenokur want to make a federal case out of the number assigned to them because (a) it could harm their reputation, (b) it could cost them customers/fees, or (c) it could mislead the lawyer-hiring public into retaining poor lawyers or… [read post]