Search for: "CLARK v. STATE"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 3,489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2007, 12:10 am
Charles Clark NASSAU COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefendant Denied Vacatur of Conviction; Guilty Plea Forfeits Any Claim Evidence Illegally Procured People v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 2:39 pm
Supreme Court said in Griffith v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:45 am
The court’s reasoning began with the well-known tripartite test for breach of confidence found in the English case of Coco v A N Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41, namely (as paraphrased by the court in LVM) that:(a) “the information must possess the quality of confidentiality;(b) the information must have been imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence; and (c) there must have been some unauthorised use of that information to the detriment of… [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am
The three-part test for breach of confidence set out in the English case of "Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd" [1969] RPC 41 is well known to common-law practitioners. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:08 pm
V. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
Clark, 179 S.W.3d 765, 767 (Tex. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:05 pm
Int'l, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 6:20 am
Roberts, The Case for Restitution and Unjust Enrichment Remedies in Patent Law, 14 Lewis & Clark L. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:14 am
Clark (2016) 63 Cal.4th 522, 562.)We review the admission of hearsay evidence under an abuse of discretion standard. [read post]
Court: Mere Presence of Pornography in Workplace May be Enough to State a Claim of Sexual Harassment
28 Nov 2007, 11:35 am
This time, in Patane v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm
Three important qualified-privilege judgments Hagaman v Little On 28 April 2017, Clark J released her reasons for a ruling during the Hagaman v Little jury trial, as to whether the words complained of were published on an occasion of privilege. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:41 am
DeAngelis v. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 7:09 am
Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 561 and Clark v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:46 pm
V. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm
G.S. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:11 am
Clark of Washington. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:46 am
’” Strahan v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 12:04 pm
The bankruptcy judge ruled in favor of the trustee citing the United States Supreme Court’s opinion of Clark v Rameker, a case involving inherited IRA accounts. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 12:04 pm
The bankruptcy judge ruled in favor of the trustee citing the United States Supreme Court’s opinion of Clark v Rameker, a case involving inherited IRA accounts. [read post]
