Search for: "California v. Texas" Results 1821 - 1840 of 4,429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2017, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Texas,” which involves the standards for assessing intellectual disability in capital cases. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm by Torsten M. Kracht and Rachel E. Mossman
Those cases were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, 3:15-cv-03747 (Aug. 2015) and are currently stayed pending the Ninth Circuit’s review of Robins v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm by Torsten M. Kracht
Those cases were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, 3:15-cv-03747 (Aug. 2015) and are currently stayed pending the Ninth Circuit’s review of Robins v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia State University College of… [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Russell Spivak
In putting the contingency claims forward, the government rests on the Supreme Court’s 1998 case Texas v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Plascencia-Orozco, Ninth Circuit] Central California: “State and federal legislation take new aim at predatory ADA lawsuits” [Garth Stapley, Modesto Bee] Tags: ADA filing mills, Article V, California, law schools, Maryland, politics, Senate, South Carolina, South Dakota April 19 roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm by Eric Goldman
As you may recall, the FTC is pursuing 1-800 Contacts for antitrust violations based on 1-800 Contacts having sued and then settled with competitors who bought keyword ads on 1-800 Contacts’ trademarks. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 1:47 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 38165 (ED CA, March 15, 2017), a California federal magistrate judge allowed an inmate to move ahead with his claim against two defendants for refusing to allow him to obtain a religious name change.In Dorsey v. [read post]