Search for: "Case Under Seal"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 6,727
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2019, 1:25 pm
It doesn't seem like the defendant even knew the guy; he just parked his car in a parking space outside a fitness club in Pacific Beach, and when he comes out of the club, he notices a pool of brake fluid under his car, and a guy (later identified as defendant, another member of the gym) sitting in a white van nearby.The victim's a Navy SEAL and, presumably, a fit guy. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
In any event, whether under the common-law right of access or under the First Amendment right of access, Volokh is entitled to access to the documents in this case. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:35 pm
However, even with this schedule it may still be spring or so before the Ninth Circuit actually hands down a decision, given the scope and scale of this case.By the way, Samsung filed a motion to intervene, but only with respect to the sealing of its highly confidential effective royalty rates under its 2018 deal with Qualcomm.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 10:13 am
First, in the case of Unum Group v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 6:55 am
Under the new law, and depending on the circumstances of each case, those convicted may face punishments that include fines between $4,000 – $10,000 as well as sentences “between 180 days in jail and 10 years in prison”. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
But the result in this case, under the Virginia statute as it's now written, strikes me as quite correct. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:03 am
The Court finds that by filing the instant motion not under seal, Mr. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:30 am
An employee of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey filed the complaint under the pseudonym "Female Port Authority Officer 47708" v Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.In this appeal to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit the court initially noted the case was captioned: “Female Port Authority Officer 47708,” until now notwithstanding the fact that the employee did not object to the use of her name in court.With respect to… [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:53 am
Under what circumstances can a government official categorically block a constituent from participating in a social media forum? [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 2:25 pm
[An interesting Massachusetts decision from a couple of months ago, upholding a trial court's refusal to seal under such circumstances.] [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 12:50 pm
Police are still discussing if her boyfriend will face charges in this case. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 3:34 am
That makes this the perfect case to do the damage. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 9:55 am
Police are still discussing if her boyfriend will face charges in this case. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 8:13 pm
Police are still discussing if her boyfriend will face charges in this case. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 12:30 pm
The defamation case eventually settles after much of it, including the entire summary judgment record, is litigated under seal. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 7:34 am
In the Giuffre case, the SDNY allowed the parties control over which documents to file under seal. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm
” One of the unbranded websites Passages created was “baltimorehealth.org,” a webpage purporting to be the Baltimore Health Resource Center that included a picture of the seal of the City of Baltimore. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
In another case, there was a computer generated signature that was deemed valid. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 11:57 am
Makers’ false claims about opioids and their problematic practices in promoting, selling, and distributing the drugs were hidden, too, in the “pervasive and deadly secrecy that shrouds product-liability cases in U.S. courts, enabled by judges who routinely allow the makers of those products to keep information pertinent to public health and safety under wraps,” Reuters reported. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:02 am
I can't speak to whether this is a sound interpretation of Michigan law, and it might be that courts in other states might reach a different result under their own states' laws. [read post]
