Search for: "Charles v. United States" Results 1821 - 1840 of 2,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2017, 6:07 am by SHG
In this case, suit was brought in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 5:10 am by SHG
  Used on a pro se criminal defendant in a court in the United States of America? [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 10:54 am by Tom Goldstein
  That intense experience in representing the United States in briefing and arguing cases before the Court over most of two Terms cannot be duplicated in any other capacity. [read post]
13 May 2010, 8:07 am by Paul Horwitz
"  The fact that Cornyn brings in both Roe v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:55 am by Beth Graham
The Texas Supreme Court then discussed the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm
On March 4, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California approved a Class Action Settlement in In Re Countrywide Financial Corporation Securities Litigation, No. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 12:23 am
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 6:04 am
For 22 years, since the money laundering statutes enactment in 1986, courts have construed "proceeds" to mean gross receipts and not net profits of illegal activity consistent with the original intent of Congress.But in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:00 am by Maxwell Kennerly
United States et al., Civil Action 02-2010, United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm by Adam Feldman
Varsity Brands to patent review in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 2:30 am by Nicandro Iannacci
One major argument is the corporate critique, powerfully articulated by Justice John Paul Stevens in his lengthy dissent to the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm by Brian E. Barreira
In the Cohen case, Justice Charles Fried of the Supreme Judicial Court concluded that Congress was effectively implementing state debtor-creditor laws when it enacted Medicaid trust laws:  “We are confirmed in this reading by something akin to legislative history: a consideration of the source from which the legislative language appears to have been taken. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm by Brian E. Barreira
In the Cohen case, Justice Charles Fried of the Supreme Judicial Court concluded that Congress was effectively implementing state debtor-creditor laws when it enacted Medicaid trust laws:  “We are confirmed in this reading by something akin to legislative history: a consideration of the source from which the legislative language appears to have been taken. [read post]