Search for: "Clear v. United States of America" Results 1821 - 1840 of 2,670
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2012, 10:42 am by stevehansen
., mechanical inventions), the written description requirement does not provide much protection against overly broad claims, at least in the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
Now that the country will resume its path to deliberate degradation and decay, it is time to return for a look at the parallel path which the Episcopal Church in the United States of America (ECUSA) is taking. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 10:25 am by Kenneth Anderson
 There has not so far been a clear statement of principles and policies as to why the CIA should have an active use of force role as a strategic matter, rather than turning it over to JSOC – the utility of it quite apart from its lawfulness. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 7:00 am
", Dennis Crouch says that this view has been advanced by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in its recent proposed guidelines. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am by Travis Casey
  It should be clear to American History scholars, that the United States distinguished itself from other countries by embracing Lockean and Madisonian principles of freedom from an overarching government. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:17 am by The Charge
  A case titled Escobedo v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
SCHWARTZ, Defendants.09-CV-2271(JS)(GRB)     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK     2012 U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:44 am by Sean Hanover
Petitioner “turned his back” on the gang as a requisite for coming to the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 2:59 am by Mara Hatfield
State case), the US Supreme Court had just overruled one of its own prior cases: In Roper v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:59 am by Gmlevine
In this case, even assuming that Complainant held registered marks in the United States and Canada, its apparent markets for financial services, it would have failed to make its prima facie case based on the Respondent’s rebuttal proof that it had both rights and legitimate interests in the use of the domain name. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:20 pm
" And it was clear to them that the states requiring separate schools "were enforcing separation because they believed that the black group was not as good as the white group. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 3:00 pm by Greg Mersol
   However, in 1983, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit rendered its decision in UAW v. [read post]