Search for: "Commitment of M B" Results 1821 - 1840 of 3,692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney
Part II surveys the provisions of the draft AUMF that have generated the most controversy and debate, including: (a) its lack of a stated purpose; (b) the prohibition on “enduring offensive ground combat operations”; (c) its definition of “associated forces”; (d) its transparency and oversight provision; (e) its relationship to the Law of Armed Conflict; (f) its sunset clause; and (g) one final matter that has flown under the radar up to this point insofar as ISIL is… [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
This week’s summaries concern: Civil Rights – Indians, Inuit and Métis – Injunctions – Courts – Education P.S. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 2:09 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In the said post, we had taken note of the decision in  ONGC v SAW Pipes where the court had provided a few illustrations of cases where actual losses need not be proved: a) Delay/ breach in contracts for construction of a road or bridge; b) Delay/ breach caused is one of the several reasons for the legal injury (for example, delay in sending casings was one of the several reasons for postponing deployment of rigs).Recently (04.02.2015), the Supreme Court of India held in M/s.… [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm by Joe Mullin
this is my life here and im scared for my family bcuz of the money i owe DreadPirateRoberts To: FriendlyChemist, 3/14/2013 I'm really sorry for your situation. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:21 am
The first, sent on December 9, 2011, stated, `I'm done helping you raise your retarded f* * *ing a* *holes. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
This project, that I’m also privileged to participate in, involves an Independent Commission of Experts comprised of Canadian Supreme Court Justice Ian Binnie, Alex Whiting at Harvard, Anita Ramasastry at the University of Washington and others. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:28 pm by David M. Ward
This year, I’m committed to a bigger daily word count. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 4:33 am by David DePaolo
They moved to dismiss the charge against them on the basis that neither could have committed comp fraud when neither had ever filed a comp claim.The judge granted their motion, finding the state was "required to prove that they obtained employment for the purpose of workers' compensation benefits" to establish a violation of Section 40.105(4)(b)9.But the 4th District Court of Appeal reversed the judge last April.The 4th DCA said Section 40.105(4)(b)9's… [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
Despite the controversy surrounding the Brown case, it seems to be common ground that Brown did in fact commit these three crimes. [read post]