Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 1821 - 1840 of 48,916
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2016, 3:06 am by Walter Olson
Gomez: make mine moot is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 6:22 am
Via Capital Defense Weekly: The New Mexico Supreme Court's recent opinion in State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:35 am by Dave Maass
" Related Cases: Automated License Plate Readers- ACLU of Southern California & EFF v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It allows the Supreme Court to review the principles concerning third-party costs orders. 426 uninsured claimants applied to the court for an order that Travelers pay their costs. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:28 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
In an appeal against the refusal of a reclaiming motion, both appellant and respondents each applied for security for their costs of the appeal. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 12:04 pm by The Complex Litigator
 In MKJA, Inc. v. 123 Fit Franchising, LLC (January 4, 2011), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) considered whther a trial court properly lifted a stay of litigation that had been imposed pursuant to section 1281.4, on the ground that the plaintiffs could not afford to pay the costs associated with arbitration. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:55 pm by Simon Gibbs
In one recent set of Replies I received the following cases were referred to: Bailey v IBC Vehicles Ltd, Cole v News Group Newspapers, Carpenter v Mid-Kent Healthcare Trust, William Patterson v Cape Darlington & Ors, Mattel Inc & Ors v RSW Group plc, Ghannouchi v Houni, Francis v Francis and Dickerson, Smith Graham v The Lord Chancellor’s Department and Crane v Canons Leisure Centre. [read post]
5 May 2024, 8:32 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Over to the team to report on Edwards Lifesciences v Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences (UPC_CFI_249/2023:"The Edwards Lifesciences v Meril preliminary injunction (PI) proceedings at the UPC on EP 3 763 331 protecting a “Prosthetic valve crimping device” (see here) started with a bang (or should this UPCKat say, crimp?) [read post]
19 Apr 2006, 9:12 am
More firms, including ours, are looking to bring some of this in-house to offer more cost effective solutions for our clients, but at the same time, vendors are beginning to lower their rates to stay competitive.We just started a 'paper v. plastic' roadshow to help illustrate the differences between handling electronic discovery the traditional way (printing everything out) and keeping it electronic. [read post]