Search for: "Courts v. Campbell" Results 1821 - 1840 of 2,914
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm by Viking
A staff sergeant from the 319th Security Forces Squadron received an Article 15 for wrongfully using Codeine (in cough syrup) a Schedule V controlled substance. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Relying on Matter of Campbell v Pesce (60 NY2d 165), the Court held thatAlthough the constitutional Double Jeopardy Clauses do not bar a second prosecution where the prior judgment of conviction has been vacated upon the defendant's motion or appeal because of an error in the proceedings (see Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33, 38; United States v Tateo, 377 US 463, 465-467), the 2003 judgment of conviction has never been vacated. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:27 pm by Peter
In it he discusses the Eleventh Circuit’s affirmance, in Campbell v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:50 am by Ben Vernia
On September 28, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Tax Court’s January 2010 judgment against whistleblower Albert Campbell. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:09 am by WSLL
CiteID=464528Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, Honorable John R. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:40 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Campbell No. 11-0403/AF Case Summary: GCM conviction of making a false official statement, larceny, and wrongful possession of Vicodin and Percocet. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:41 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
  On the other hand, Campbell seems quite consistent with the Supreme Court’s recent retreat from Faretta in Indiana v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  He noted that “one facet of the public interest can be correcting a false image, referring to the PCC Code and to Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 [65]. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:26 am by Michael O'Hear
  On the other hand, Campbell seems quite consistent with the Supreme Court’s recent retreat from Faretta in Indiana v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:19 am by Kiera Flynn
Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:18 pm by INFORRM
  He noted that “one facet of the public interest can be correcting a false image, referring to the PCC Code and to Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 [65]. [read post]