Search for: "D & W Corporation" Results 1821 - 1840 of 2,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2010, 2:20 pm by Joel Jacobsen
  He said they were wrong about the reality of the political world in which they spend their working (and in many cases their waking) lives: [W]e now conclude that independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 2:29 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
§ 6302(d); (ii) for contribution of CJR’s pro rata share of the Fraud Award; and (iii) to pierce CJR’s corporate veil and to hold its sole stockholder liable for any amount CJR may owe. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
Prescription drugs are invaluable tools in the practice of medicine, used to treat numerous illnesses and diseases. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:00 am by Andrew Frisch
Myrick had to perform this managerial task after store hours because “[w]hile I was at the store I was always busy doing something else. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by Adam Thierer
” He said he wasn’t sure what the solution was, but threw out a few ideas discussed at the conference: maybe special tax treatment for newspapers, a Corporation for Public Broadcasting-like fund, or for the newspaper industry to charge fees for the re-use of its content, similar to the model that the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers uses. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:14 pm by Russell Jackson
"  This is one of them:  In re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation, 2010 WL 60955 (D. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(Inventive Step) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses W D Washington on rare interference ruling: Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Cardiac Science Operating Company (Washington State Patent Law Blog) CAFC: Design patents – symmetry requires elimination of points-of-novelty test for anticipation: International Seaway Trading Corp. v Walgreens Corporation (Patently-O) (IP Osgoode) CAFC: Means plus function claim element does not cover ‘spectrum of undisclosed… [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm by Mike Aylward
  As with the “W” states in general, the Wisconsin Supreme Court seems to relish the opportunity to pioneer new territory for which it can claim coverage. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:53 am
It was to Patent Office Commissioner Casper W. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:02 am by Michael Geist
  The crown corporation objected to a union-inspired video about the mail carrier's CEO. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 7:27 pm by Kevin Funnell
“[W]e don’t have direct influence over our independent regulators. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Hamilton (Drake), Gregg W. [read post]