Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 7,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2019, 10:09 am
I did not. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:26 am
In my research and writing on the Marshall Court, you see many examples of a Justice saying something like this: "I think that the Constitution means X. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:19 am
” But that doesn’t put it in the clear (and, again, Mayer is emphatically not suggesting it does). [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:32 pm
And is it worth paying more for lawyer sneakiness or does the price mechanism adjust for it? [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:40 am
Sometimes, an insurance carrier does not pay. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The court also accepts the FCC’s argument that even though Voice over the Internet Protocol services make it possible to originate and receive telephone calls, that functionality by itself does not make wireless networks fully interconnected with the PSTN, nor does it deemphasize the core, non-telecommunications nature of broadband Internet access. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The court also accepts the FCC’s argument that even though Voice over the Internet Protocol services make it possible to originate and receive telephone calls, that functionality by itself does not make wireless networks fully interconnected with the PSTN, nor does it deemphasize the core, non-telecommunications nature of broadband Internet access. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
App’x. 964). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 2:02 pm
I recommend a few steps. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 11:13 am
Thus, the Commission can choose to apply Title I and not Title II—but if it does, its choice will be meaningless. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
I. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 12:44 pm
The opinion does not report the extent to which Mr. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 10:05 pm
In this first picture, I used my son’s iPhone X. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
I asked my friend’s wife for a copy of the forms that she received from their lawyer. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 9:10 pm
” gets the response “I barely know X. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
PracticeUnclear Days: Computing Time in Statutes and Regulations Shawn Erker What does it mean when a statute or regulation says that there must be “x days between” two actions? [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm
All documents referred to shall be [...](4) Any part of a party's appeal case which does not meet the requirements in paragraph 2 is to be regarded as an amendment, unless the party demonstrates that this part was admissibly raised and maintained in the proceedings leading to the decision under appeal. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 12:14 pm
When you sell a widget, you know your work is done when you deliver X number of widgets for Y price. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
If the statute says that I can't do X while Y, and I do X but not Y, I could see a legitimate complaint if they threw me in prison on the theory the statute should have said that you can't do X "or" Y. [read post]
