Search for: "David Thomas Wells" Results 1821 - 1840 of 2,572
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The problem is assessed with reference to the of the fourth and fifth phases of the Softwood Lumber controversy between the United States and Canada - an immense dispute featuring the interplay between domestic litigation, investment arbitration and dispute settlement conducted under the rules of different chapters of the regional trade agreement (North American Free Trade Agreement), WTO dispute settlement, as well as interstate arbitration proceedings conducted within the London Court of… [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:46 am by Lawrence Solum
Scott Thomas Fitzgibbon (Boston College - Law School) has posted ‘That Man is You! [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:22 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
Bourke retained an expert, who testified that the lawyers were negligent in failing to ask follow-up questions of some of the potential jurors and that they failed to strike one juror who did not like guns.The Seventh Circuit summarized the testimony as follows: "Bourke submitted the expert report of David Thomas, a clinical professor at IIT-Chicago Kent College of Law and a trial attorney with thirty-five years of experience. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:22 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
Bourke retained an expert, who testified that the lawyers were negligent in failing to ask follow-up questions of some of the potential jurors and that they failed to strike one juror who did not like guns.The Seventh Circuit summarized the testimony as follows: "Bourke submitted the expert report of David Thomas, a clinical professor at IIT-Chicago Kent College of Law and a trial attorney with thirty-five years of experience. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
  The law is against them,  and according to the Reuters Institute, the public is as well. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:35 am by Jon Hyman
David Brent begot Michael Scott, his U.S. counterpart and the second most inappropriate boss ever. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:29 pm by David Kopel
Volkmer also had to win over Republicans to support his bill, a skill which he had already mastered in Missouri, and which he used well in Washington.Volkmer succeeded. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am by INFORRM
  Netanyahu’s lawyer, David Shimron, said after the suit was filed that “never since the 1950s, has there been such a grievous case of libel. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:08 am by Lawrence Cunningham
 The Court would do well to find a more practical and legitimate approach to assessing the validity of state law under the FAA. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:09 am by Lawrence Cunningham
Still others, others, like Randall Thomas and Harwell Wells, look to enhanced corporate law oversight, invoking officer fiduciary duties, recently explicated in Gantler v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:59 am
This month, CDT Fellow David Post writes about the Internet and the recent revolutions in the Middle East. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:48 pm
Toby also explained that by filing for both a UM and an invention patent in China, you can obtain both short-term protection as well as long-term protection; once the invention patent is ready to grant, then the Examiner may ask you to elect to keep either the UM or the Invention patent and abandon the other one in order to avoid double-patenting. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 10:11 am by Charon QC
  Hand wringing by axe wielding politicians and the repeated mantra that we must live within our means is all very well. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:05 am by Nabiha Syed
Warren Richey of Christian Science Monitor observes that the oral argument seemed “divided along well-established liberal-conservative lines”; similarly, David Savage of Los Angeles Times reports that the court’s liberal justices spoke up in defense of Arizona’s law, but appeared to be one vote short of majority, and Bill Mears of CNN reports that the Court’s conservative majority “appeared to hold the cards” in the case. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:01 pm by Tom K.
Their clinical judgment must certainly be well beyond any reasonable doubt. [read post]