Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 1821 - 1840 of 29,811
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Federation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:58 am by Jesse Mondry
My law firm’s international dispute resolution team is working on a massive case where it will be arguing that the defendants’ failure to use the standard language to describe what should be covered by arbitration means defendants actually intended only contract claims (and no other claims between the parties) to be arbitrated. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:52 am
Dismisses "GREEN GOO" Infringement Action Due to Incontestability of Defendant's Right to Use the Mark TTAB Posts October 2022 Hearing Schedule: Nine Virtual and Three In-Person HearingsText ©John L. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 6:08 pm by Melody McDonald Lanier
The enhanced “super” charge was codified in Texas’ existing aggravated sexual assault statute to create a new punishment scheme under §22.021(f) in cases where the victim is under the age of six at the time of the offense or if the victim was younger than 14 and there was an additional aggravating factor as described in §22.021(a)(2)(A). [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 10:14 am by David Whitaker and Shearil Matthews
In the meantime, however, there are many Louisiana businesses who have been named as defendants in lawsuits filed in other states (like California or Florida) based on the fact that a resident of those states browsed the websites from those jurisdictions. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:42 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1989), which requires the plaintiff to show that the defendant’s use of the mark is either (1) “not artistically relevant to the underlying work” or (2) “explicitly misleads consumers as to the source or content of the work. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 1:52 pm by Francis Pileggi
In a November 15 ruling after oral argument on the privilege log issue, the vice chancellor had ordered that within five business days, Plaintiff must produce to Defendant in unredacted form the 563 documents from its log that Plaintiff had entirely withheld and for which Plaintiff has identified no attorney. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 11:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Kast, 921 F.3d 822 (9th Cir. 2019), that while Luvdarts was decided after Louis Vuitton, it did not “explicitly overrule it. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Supreme Court, denied the plaintiff’s motion and awarded the defendant attorney’s fees of $6,987.50. [read post]