Search for: "Does 1-58" Results 1821 - 1840 of 2,966
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Western Auto Supply Co., 18 P.3d 49, 56-58 (Alaska 2001) (§12); Smith v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am by John Mikhail
  At least five key episodes or “moments” in Marshall’s life stand out in this regard, all of which help to illuminate and reinforce Schwartz’s thesis that Marshall’s embrace of implied powers was more cautious than is commonly recognized, and why he seems correct to conclude that McCulloch “offered something to both nationalists and moderate Jeffersonian Republicans” in 1819 and “is simply too ambiguous to mandate a particular… [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
[b] Live Testimony As of January 1, 2013, live testimony of a vocational expert at trial at the WCAB is allowed only upon a showing of good cause. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:03 am by Josh Wright
To the contrary, the experimental evidence arguably implies that the endowment effect does not result in capital market failure. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
We won't rehash those posts, since you can read them yourselves, but in a nutshell, the biggest problems courts have had with ADE-based epidemiology are: (1) the reports are wholly anecdotal, since the government does not there to be any causation criteria; and (2) since reporting is voluntary, it's highly influenced by outside events - chiefly adverse publicity concerning this or that drug.That's the legal side.These two articles, on the other hand, are from… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
[…] The OD decided that claim 1 was not patentable on the grounds of lack of novelty but left out the essential issue of inventive step (A 52(1), A 56). [read post]
21 May 2020, 8:09 am by Kristi Obafunwa and Chynna Anderson
  Recently, Louisiana’s Governor, in Proclamation JBE 2020-58, lifted the Stay-at Home Order and modified the emergency provisions in consideration of the ongoing pandemic. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 1:32 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
The letter does not identify any other basis on which this factual conclusion might be founded and it was completely at odds with what the complainant had repeatedly said, including in paragraph 58 of her request for review, which provides a credible explanation of her circumstances. [read post]
However, it does not currently intend to expand the definition of “financial instrument” in Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the RAO to include presently unregulated cryptoassets. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
To decide whether § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) is unconstitutionally overbroad or vague on its face, this Court does not have to consider exactly how the line between solicitation and abstract advocacy will be drawn. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York City Family Lawyer said that the Court herein Does not hold that all persons who are in the same financial status as the plaintiff, Gloria M. [read post]