Search for: "Grant v. United States of America"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 3,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
United States of America et al. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
United States of America et al. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:13 am
Congress was motivated by evidence that state and local governments were not protecting the rights of Black citizens (both formerly enslaved people and others), particularly in the former Confederate States of America. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Lebowitz The author is a Queens County Supreme Court justice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am
Omega SA v Omega Engineering Incorporated (IPKat) PCC Page 30: Managing your tentacles: Cautious Co and IPOff Ltd (PatLit) (PatLit) The UK Patent Box – more details, not necessarily much more clarification (IP finance) (IP finance) (Solo IP) (IP finance) (Intellectual Property Tax) Gaston Kroub on the UKIPO ‘Green Channel’ initiative two years In (Part I – Green Patent Blog) (Part II – Green Patent Blog) United States US Patent Reform… [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:49 am
United Insurance Company of America. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm
United States, Welch v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
If a state were to pass a law today saying that, say, its governor will decide which slate of electors will represent the state in the Electoral College every four years, that law would not violate the United States Constitution.Now, however, such laws have no prospect of being passed in enough states to guarantee a Republican win in 2024. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:05 am
District Judge Stephen V. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 3:01 am
Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Fortress's first motion to dismiss Apple and Intel's complaint, but also allowed the plaintiffs to amend the complaint. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:44 am
”Ricardo Media Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
The agreements are said to have been made outside the United States, in Europe, Mexico and Canada, but to have been given effect in the United States. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:37 pm
By Brian Lynch The Supreme Court of the United States recently announced it would hear oral arguments in three cases involving the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:35 pm
It’s almost here . . . the Senate vote to confirm Elena Kagan as the 112th Justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 8:52 am
Meese v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am
Illinois 13-5967Issue: Whether a defendant is acquitted for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, where a court grants a motion for directed verdict after the prosecution refuses to present any evidence at trial to the empaneled and sworn jury. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
IPOff Ltd (PatLit) UK investment in IP-protected assets reached £65bn by 2008, research finds (Out-Law.com) United States US Patent Reform USPTO prepares for Patent Reform (Patents Post Grant Blog) Patent reform awaits Senate compromise on debt ceiling (Patents Post Grant Blog) America Invents Act: Qui tam provision and virtual patent marking (Maier & Maier) Interview with Chief Judge Paul R. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am
” The final point ended up consuming a good bit of Hallward-Driemeier’s time: what to make of the decision of the major institutional actors that appeared in the case – the United States and the Bank of America – to file on the debtor’s side, supporting the right to appeal. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Eight months before the 2016 presidential election, the President of the United States nominated a respected jurist to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court. [read post]
