Search for: "Gray v. HAS" Results 1821 - 1840 of 1,985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2021, 8:17 am by Eric Halliday, Rachael Hanna
This is particularly relevant because domestic terrorism occupies a gray area in federal criminal law between international terrorism and nonterrorism criminal offenses. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am by Aaron Tang
Its single complaint about the interim map, that it fails to consider state requirements that county boundaries be respected, has long been rejected as a matter of both Voting Rights Act and constitutional (Gray v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 10:04 pm
  Reasons for judgement were released today (Heppner v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:25 am by Howard Wasserman
But predicting that the Fourth Circuit would recognize such a claim is not the same as saying the Court has recognized such a claim and the latter is necessary to say a right has been clearly established. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 9:30 pm by Howard Wasserman
But predicting that the Fourth Circuit would recognize such a claim is not the same as saying the Court has recognized such a claim and the latter is necessary to say a right has been clearly established. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 8:23 am
  I looked up some federal case law and what I saw was in line with these statements -- a judge has the authority to set such a deadline to assist with trial management and is not bound to accept any agreement after that, except for good cause. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 1:20 pm
Lindsay Harrison, another Biglaw associate who argued before the Court recently, is also out and has litigated LGBT rights cases (e.g., Lawrence v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:11 am by Anna Bower
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Patton v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  But the time it takes for a case to reach this stage varies substantially from 3 months (Ali v Associated Newspapers 2010 EWHC 100 (QB)) to 28 months (Kaschke v Gray 2010 EWHC 1907 (QB)) and it may well be that in many of the judgments in favour of the claimant, quantum remains in issue. [read post]