Search for: "HERRING v. U.S."
Results 1821 - 1840
of 25,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2012, 8:26 pm
" U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:27 pm
So, here, in a particular case, maybe having the victim testify via a two-way video while she sits in Minnesota (the trial's in federal court in California) might perhaps be okay.But when there's an readily available alternative -- just delay the trial for a couple of months, since the reason the victim can't testify in person is because she's seven months pregnant and says that her doctor doesn't want her to travel -- that doesn't count as… [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 9:28 am
Additional Resources: Grammer v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:45 am
And in Herring v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:05 am
Silva, 2012 U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 4:16 am
Wade, 2012 U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm
Geren and Hamdi v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 3:22 am
In Capitol v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 6:32 am
Rath v. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 9:04 am
Officers asked an occupant during the search to produce drugs on her person, and she pulled a sock with crack in it from her groin. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 12:30 pm
United States v. $6,976,934.65, No. 07-5383 (D.C. [read post]
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: The Supreme Court Is No Safe Haven for Abortion Rights
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
There is still no ruling from the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:58 am
’ In Wisconsin v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Last month, our Miami personal injury attorneys saw that the U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 4:56 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 12:04 pm
On May 21, 2008, in Wormuth v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a retaliation lawsuit (EEOC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 4:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for failing to accommodate a registered nurse who couldn’t return to her previous position because a work injury resulted in lifting restrictions.Although she expressed interest in other slots (for which she was qualified), the monsters at Munster opted to terminate her employment.Because such conduct was allegedly violative of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
