Search for: "Head v. The University" Results 1821 - 1840 of 3,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Leaving aside any financial issues, this is a wrong-headed policy that will necessarily limit the impact that the Supreme Court can have on the New Zealand way of life. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 8:45 am by Ron Coleman
Such a request grafts an objective standard onto 512(c)(3)(A)(v)  . . . [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:57 pm
"  (see Sony v Universal (1984))Essentially, saying that fair use is an affirmative defence is a misnomer as it is a right granted by the Copyright Act. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:20 am by Richard Rothstein
The blog is delighted to host an online symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
If you read Justice O’Connor’s opinions like Mississippi Univ. for Women v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Zuiderveen Borgesius, Utrecht University – Centre for Intellectual Property Law and University of Amsterdam – Institute for Information Law (IViR) The Right to Be Forgotten v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:38 am
Irenas was a partner there, and was universally acknowledged to be the smartest lawyer in the building. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:29 am
The first speaker at the Copyright session was the influential Professor Andrew Christie, Professor of IP Law at the University of Melbourne. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The Worst $90,000 Ever Spent: Ten Questions About Mike Duffy, Nigel Wright, the Criminal Code and the Canadian Criminal Justice SystemPeter Sankoff, Professor, University of Alberta Faculty of Law Excerpt: Introduction and points 1-4. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Top-Free Rights for Women in New York: People v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 8:30 pm
In July 2010, the New York State legislature passed a law -- Chapter 303 of the Laws of 2010 -- amending the mandatory PIP endorsement's intoxication exclusion by requiring New York no-fault insurers to pay for "necessary emergency health services rendered in a general hospital" to persons injured as a result of operating a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated condition or while the person's ability to operate the vehicle is impaired by the use of a drug. [read post]