Search for: "In Re Adoption of J" Results 1821 - 1840 of 2,675
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
Risk assessments would seemingly be about assessing risks, but they are not. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
April 2004 CanadaAbstractAlthough some studies suggest positive effects of treatment for sexual offenders, most studies have been hampered by the unknown influence of selective attrition (e.g., volunteers and drop-outs). [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Building on its recent decision in In re Petrobras Securities Litigation,[9] the Second Circuit held that a plaintiff need not always offer direct event study evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship between new information and stock price movements before satisfying its burden to prove market efficiency at the class certification stage. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Since the Claimant’s husband was due to leave the army in February 2014 after twenty-two years’ service he would have returned to England one and a half to two years before that date to undertake re-settlement training. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:12 am
Those burdens can be divided broadly in two categories: (a) high fees and onerous requirements and (b) uncertainties in procedural and substantive standards.[8] When companies have to confront nations with premerger and post merger reviews, while the authorities in a nation that adopts a premerger review would be closing its own review of the merger, the authority in the second merger review model will be just getting started with their own analysis.[9] As a result, we have increased… [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am by Kurt J. Schafers
If the person is seeking admission or re-admission to the industry; and1. the person is subject to an order under Exchange Act Section 15(b)(4)(H)(i), then the person must file an application unless the order imposing a bar on the person is time-limited and the time period is expired. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm by Eric W. Orts
” Dobbs now frees the states to adopt any legal restriction beginning at conception, including criminal penalties against mothers and doctors. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
Materially, clause 3 provides as follows: “3         Interpretation of the Convention rights  … (2)  A court determining a question which has arisen in connection with a Convention right – (a)  must have particular regard to the text of the Convention right, and in interpreting the text may have regard to the preparatory work of the Convention; (b)  may have regard to the development under the common law of any right… [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
.), Terrebonne (Saint-Jérôme)Décision de : Juge Nancy McKennaDate : 18 octobre 2021 Résumé PÉNAL (DROIT) — procédure pénale — procédure fédérale — arrêt des procédures — abus de confiance par un fonctionnaire public — corruption dans les affaires municipales — obligation de la poursuite — divulgation de la preuve — communication de la preuve… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
(The IP Factor)   Canada Canada favours early release of ACTA text (Michael Geist) Dust up in the art world – Canadian trade mark registrations for PAINTERS 11 and PAINTERS ELEVEN (Canadian Trademark Blog) VANOC uses copyright to target ticket re-seller (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) MIT adopts university-wide open access mandate (Michael Geist)   China Third revision of China’s patent law (Post-Grant Opposition) (Hal Wegner) How to… [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court also held that another provision of the Act, Section 5, was likely unconstitutional as well, partly because it's too vague: Plaintiffs separately challenge Section 5 of the Act, which purports to protect minors from the dangers of inappropriate books at the public library by requiring libraries to adopt a process for challenging books in their collections. [read post]