Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 1821 - 1840
of 18,398
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2024, 5:31 pm
But, in two important ones involving Trump—Trump v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:56 am
It's equally, if not more, true for appellate justices. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 6:10 am
In State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:27 am
We’re now halfway through the Supreme Court’s November sitting. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:30 pm
SOURCE: TEXAS SUPREME COURT - 13-0928 - IN RE STEVEN LIPSKY [Opinion by Justice Divine in pdf] - 4/24/2015 CITATION: In re Lipsky, No. 13-0928, ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. 2015) COA OPINION BELOW: In re Lipsky, 411 S.W.3d 530 (Tex.App. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 3:58 am
See, e.g., Papish v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 12:31 pm
Justice Premo sanctions the appellant, Foust. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 10:57 am
—Austin 2016), rev’d per curiam, 567 S.W.3d 327 (Tex. 2019); Prize Energy Res., L.P. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am
“You’ve got to know what you’re shooting at,” the Chief Justice observed, “before you can tell if you’ve missed. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
See SEC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
Court (In re Benvin), 791 F.3d 1096, 1104 (9th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) ("Here, the appearance of justice will best be served by reassignment to a different judge. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
The application came before Mr Justice Jay – Mr Justice Nicklin having previously directed that the application should be made on notice to the Defendants. [read post]
2 May 2007, 12:21 am
Wisconsin Right to Life, and during the oral argument, the Justices who comprised the majority in Gonzales v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:43 am
Hood v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:02 pm
Maybe they're worried about escapes. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:07 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 5:21 am
“Under the circumstances, we find that, although plaintiff delayed in seeking an extension of his time to re-serve the complaint, the motion court appropriately exercised its discretion when it extended plaintiff’s time in the interest of justice (CPLR 306-b), as plaintiff established the existence of several relevant factors weighing in favor of an extension (see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95, 104-105 [2001]; Chase Home Fin. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
Justice Thomas is next with the opinion in Utah v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:08 am
Kent v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
Citizen Charged in Spanish Attack on NK Embassy Satisfies Court re Extradition Prehearing Release appeared first on IELR Blog. [read post]
