Search for: "In the Matter of: Graham"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 2,073
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2009, 11:26 am
The few remaining matters could presumably be dealt with by the Copyright Board. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:03 pm
Graham Steele has more at the Fair Arbitration Now blog. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:31 pm
The nurses said they forgot to order the blood and gave no apologies, as if it didn't matter. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:51 pm
In Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:04 pm
The left is likely to gain a little ground in at least one of the juvenile sentencing cases (Graham and Sullivan), in which the life sentence will likely be invalidated. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 3:54 pm
Publicity about the issue died down, however, after Charter retreated from its plan, and Congress moved on to other matters. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:40 am
It doesn't matter much what she actually did -- what matters here is that she did not make an enemy. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:23 pm
The factual inquiries relevant to obviousness are set forth in Graham v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:16 am
"I'd welcome informed disagreement, but the ban on detainee transfers to the U.S. seems to me without serious justification as a matter of policy. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:11 am
This morning's sessions were quite packed, with an estimated 370+ people from various sectors of technology gathering to talk about IP valuation, prosecution and enforcementOf US matters-->Speaker: Todd Dickinson, Executive Director AIPLA. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
See Graham v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 8:29 am
Even if these general practitioners ultimately refer the matter to a patent attorney, John believes there is still a need for such non-specialists to be aware of certain statutory deadlines and other pitfalls of practice in the specialized area of patent law. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
The adequacy of a warning directed to physicians is such a matter. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:21 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Graham M. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 7:49 am
The Obama Administration is acting like scoundrels on this matter. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:15 pm
Elections matter. [read post]
24 May 2009, 8:40 pm
There is no evidence, admissible or otherwise which would support such a conclusion as a matter of law. [read post]
12 May 2009, 5:28 pm
Now if you jump over to so-called non-contentious matters under Rule 74, if you bring an application for assistance, that’s another very common step in most matters. [read post]
9 May 2009, 12:59 pm
As an initial matter, I would say that I agree with the Senators' desire to "move on" from the now decried opinions of various administration lawyers. [read post]
9 May 2009, 5:16 am
"Other matters I can't discuss with you because it would prejudice anything else. [read post]
