Search for: "John Doe #2" Results 1821 - 1840 of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2013, 7:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
In particular, California law does not specifically cover claims brought "in response to" government petitioning activity. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:19 am by John L. Welch
But the Board concluded that Spirits does not apply here because it dealt with an issue of geographical deceptiveness under Section 2(e)(3). [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 3:40 am by John L. Welch
The Board disagreed:The assertion that opposer may have fraudulently procured its registration, while stating a valid ground for cancellation of a registration that is more than five years old, does not allow applicant to assert a ground that is available only when a registration is less than five years old.The Board therefore granted opposer's motion to dismiss applicant's second counterclaim as time-barred by Section 14 of the Act.Read comments and post your comments here.Text Copyright… [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:16 am by MBettman
Johnson appealed, and in a unanimous decision authored by Judge Richard Rogers, joined by Judges Stephen Shaw and John Willamowski, the Third District affirmed the trial court’s findings and grant of permanent custody to CCDJFS. [read post]
22 May 2008, 9:04 pm
--No where in the text of S-431 does it say to "expel" yet it is clear, that is the intent according to McCain. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 11:07 am
She further concluded that the John Doe's activity here--making important sport events accessible to the public for little or no payment--is socially important and carry significant social gains. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Adebayo Lanlokun, Olswang LLP
The exact effect of the words “cessation of approval” in s 591C(2) were easy to comprehend in relation to the methods of approval withdrawal under s 591A and s 591B(1) as withdrawal is automatic under those two provisions. [read post]