Search for: "Jones v. State" Results 1821 - 1840 of 6,826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:27 am by Howard Wasserman
Trump has moved to dismiss, arguing that a sitting President enjoys immunity from suit in state court (stated differently, Clinton v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:24 am by Richard Primus
  Right now, there is a pending suit in state court in New York raising that next question.The suit, Zervos v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 12:31 am by Orin Kerr
From that perspective Katz was something like United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:58 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Felony murder and robbery A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted Antomar Jones (“Appellant”) of two counts of robbery with a dangerous weapon; one count of felony murder; one count of attempted second-degree murder; two counts of use of a handgun in the commission ... [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:22 am by Joy Waltemath
Although a federal district court in Florida compelled arbitration of Jones Act negligence and sexual assault claims, among other claims against an employer arising out of an alleged on-ship rape of an employee, citing the arbitration clause in her employment contract, it would not compel arbitration of claims against the cruise line that owned the ship (or the individual defendant) because they were not signatories to the agreement (Haasbroek v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
 Canada In the case of R v Jones 2017 SCC 60, the Supreme Court held that text messages may attract a reasonable expectation of privacy even after they have been sent and received. [read post]