Search for: "Kat" Results 1821 - 1840 of 6,610
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2023, 2:17 am by Nedim Malovic
The topics covered were numerous and very technical (biologic drugs, second medical use patents, SPC waivers and divisional patents, just to name a few) and the synthesis abilities of this former Kat do not allow for them to be covered here.A litigator Kat whispering in the ears of a poor UPC Judge (ph. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
There's definitely something wrong ...The IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 relating to silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here, and this Kat here). [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:38 am by Neil Wilkof
Since those heady days, this Kat has sensed a notable decline in the public decibel level. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:35 am
As previously commented, this Kat enjoyed the event and feels much better informed. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 2:44 am by Jocelyn Bosse
However, it was not until some major reforms in 2020 that the law extended to Indigenous lands and traditional knowledge (this Kat previously wrote about these reforms here). [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:27 am
(As well, these days, this Kat less often encounters references to the marketing advantages of the Apple ecosystem across its product lines.) [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 11:10 pm
This Kat summarizes in two posts the second batch of amendments. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:34 am
 Since €100 was "feared", the proposed level of €80 (per "patent family" - it is not clear to this Kat whether a divisional counts as the same "family") fits this description. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 10:36 am
 Regrettably in this Kat's opinion, only 11 Member States (Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, and the United Kingdom) took part in the Public Consultation. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:29 am by Peter Ling
This Kat is looking forward to the next comic books (and next developments of IP law?) [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 1:41 pm
This Kat hopes that his academic colleagues from afar will be able to attend in order to present papers based on their own final thoughts or on their work in progress, and urges them to do so if they can. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:13 pm
This Kat is uncomfortable with any form of industrial action that hits bona fide users, such as strikes and walk-outs ["walks-out?" [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 10:10 am
  Kat Neil Wilkof recently posed the question of whether IP is truly an asset. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 6:53 am
However this Kat disagrees, and believes that it comes about as a result of the EPO’s approach to inherency in medical treatment situations. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 8:48 am by Sophie Corke
 One small comment this Kat would make is that the punctuation in the English translation appears to follow Spanish norms, as does some of the phrasing. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 9:08 am
Be that as it may, for this Kat, Fortune’s tale raises a fundamental question about trade secrets as an instrument of national policy. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 7:24 am
 The infringement lawsuit itself, in this Kat’s viewpoint, is quite straightforward. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 2:12 am by Rose Hughes
To this Kat, it is the insufficiency objection that is particularly revealing. [read post]