Search for: "Levine v. State"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 1,905
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2008, 9:03 am
The Supreme Court, however, is also scheduled to hear arguments in Levine v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:32 pm
[17] Levine, supra note 6 [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:01 am
Levine, in which the federal government and pharmaceutical manufacturers argue that Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of prescription drug labeling preempts state "failure-to-warn" litigation, and in Altria v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
Levine, No. 06-1249, that pre-emption is implicit in the structure of the statute. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:43 pm
Example: the superrealist identical copy, as Sherrie Levine makes. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
Two years ago an appellate judge upheld the bar to recovery:"Without such a bright-line requirement, the concept of 'marital-type' relationship is unacceptably vulnerable to duplicitous manipulation," Judge Jose Fuentes wrote in Levine v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
In Levine, as we've mentioned, there aren't any allegations of violations at all. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:20 am
The new case is Gourdine v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 5:42 am
Medtronic and Levine v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 1:44 am
Reed made a comment to yesterday's IPBiz post on the "state of the union" speech of George Bush. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:33 pm
Stay tuned.With the grant of cert in Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:25 pm
The Wyeth v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 7:30 am
In Wyeth v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 6:14 pm
Levine, No. 06-1249, the Court will decide whether the FDA's prescription drug labeling judgments preempt state law liability claims... [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 10:11 am
Levine, 06-1249). [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 7:55 am
Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992) (holding that state common law torts were something that was subject to preemption), Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
McIlrath, No. 07-1266 Sentence for traveling across state lines to have sex with a minor is affirmed where: 1) remarks of the judge at sentencing discharged his duty to consider not only the sentencing guidelines, but [read post]
