Search for: "Likely v. State" Results 1821 - 1840 of 82,283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2012, 11:02 am
  But it -- like the other Ninth Circuit opinion this morning -- contains a new "Summary" section that looks very much like the "Syllabus" in opinions of the United States Suprme Court. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:18 am by John Bursch
Federal Election Commission, the case that could overturn the landmark Austin v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:26 pm by Charles Bieneman
  This probably goes without saying ten times over, but, in a software case, never file a claim without a machine (unless you have something like the rubber-curing process of Diamond v. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
" The judge found the claims to be without merit, since the Fourth Circuit does not require unindicted co-conspirators to be named, no statement of facts is required, and the indictment stated the period of the conspiracy.Counsel erred in moving the original indictment into evidence. [read post]
This caution has been recapitulated in R v Anwar & Ors [2016] EWCA Crim 551, the first Court of Appeal judgment to consider R v Jogee, in which Sir Brian Leveson P observed that “the evidential requirements justifying a decision that there is a case to answer are likely to be the same even if, applying the facts to the different directions in law, the jury might reach a different conclusion. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm by David Super
  And an Article V convention is about the least likely means of achieving that. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
The Court next held that the FAA preempts Washington state law on substantive unconscionability, like the "Rule of Discover Bank" addressed in Concepcion. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 10:10 am by Venkat
"Connecticut Court of Appeals Tackles Authentication of Facebook Messages -- State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:19 pm by Eric Goldman
The post Plaintiffs Fire Back Against Florida’s Censorship Law–NetChoice v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:51 am by Lawrence Solum
Part V returns to this question of the value of interpretive consensus. [read post]