Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 1821 - 1840 of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by chief
Regular readers will recall that blanket policies are not to be encouraged (those with a need for more citable authority should see something like Lord Browne-Wilkinson in R v SSHD ex p Venables). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:34 am by chief
Regular readers will recall that blanket policies are not to be encouraged (those with a need for more citable authority should see something like Lord Browne-Wilkinson in R v SSHD ex p Venables). [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:23 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am by INFORRM
House of Lords Tuesday 19 June, 10.30am & 4pm, Defamation Bill Committee. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:03 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland), heard 8-9 March 2016. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am by Fiona de Londras
Lord Hope’s Decision in Powell I don’t intend here to go through the facts of Powell but rather to outline the stages of the review required that Lord Hope lays out in the judgment: 1. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:13 am
  Subject to the Front Comor argument which I consider later in this judgment, the Court of Appeal’s decision in C v D is to be taken as correctly stating the law. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 4:20 pm
The range of manoeuvre available to a U.K. court, as illustrated in the above passages from the opinions of Lord Hope and Lord Steyn, is not available to an Irish Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Just before the Christmas break, however, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Clift v Slough Borough Council ([2010] EWCA Civ 1171). [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
In 1943, the Court in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Jurisdictional Boundaries of Prior Use within Britain: An analysis of the House of Lords’ judgments in Roebuck v Stirling (1774) and Brown v Annandale (1842)Barbara Henry (University of Hertfordshire)Commentator | Eva Hemmungs Wirtén (Linköping University, Sweden) Two cases, 60 years apart. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 15 December 2017 Chaney J handed down judgment in the case of Rayney v State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 367. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am by INFORRM
While the Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh had regarded it as an open question whether Reynolds applies to opinion, Lords Nicholls and Hobhouse had said in Reynolds ([2001] 2 AC 127, at 201 and 193-5 per Lord Nicholls and 237-8 per Lord Hobhouse.) that the expression of opinion was protected, if at all by, by fair comment. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am by charonqc
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
On Tuesday 11th and Wednesday 12th October, the court will hear the Reference by the Lord Advocate of devolution issues under paragraph 34 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998. [read post]