Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 4,050
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2014, 9:13 pm
The starting point is the divergent impact of the ECtHR’s jurisdiction within the Convention States. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm
These were questions in Lawal & Anor v Circle 33 Housing Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 1514. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 11:42 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 9:26 am
We also received judgments in some eagerly awaited cases including Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate (Scotland) on the issue of prisoner voting following the instant dismissal of the appeal at the end of the hearing in July 2014 to provide an answer before Scottish Referendum took place on the 18 September 2014. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 8:04 am
On Friday, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), after four years of litigation, shifted its strategy in its banner NSA case, Jewel v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:33 am
Back in October the Kat's friends at Rouse organised a lovely little event to commemorate the 20th anniversary of Biogen v Medeva, one of the most influential patent law decisions to have been handed down by the UK's House of Lords (now rebranded the Supreme Court, but we still know who they are ...). [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 8:59 am
” Kerr v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:00 am
This week, the Supreme Court hears the appeal in Hotak v London Borough of Southwark, which is joined with the appeals in Johnson v Solihull and Kanu v Southwark. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:38 am
For this reason, Mr Anson had paid federal and state tax in the US on his share of HV’s profits. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:47 am
In the present case, the Secretary of State sought to persuade the Supreme Court to wind back to the House of Lords decision on what art 5(1) entailed. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 1:13 am
The position presented in the case differs drastically to what has been discussed in the United States, where programs can be protected by copyright. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:06 am
Lord Tyre stated that this was an act of “reckless folly” which was not excused by Ms Jackson’s age (Ehrari v Curry [2007] EWCA Civ 120 distinguished). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:18 am
Indeed, Lord Sumption stated that the standard of fairness in a debtor-creditor relationship is a matter for the court, on which it must make its own determinations (paragraph 17 of the judgment). [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:49 am
In Warger v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 2:32 am
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 1587; [2013] EWHC 3777 (Admin) The Supreme Court had to consider if it should depart from the previous House of Lords judgment in R (James & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice following the ECtHR ruling in James v UK when considering the joined appeals relating to prisoners sentenced to imprisonment for public protection or life imprisonment. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 12:31 am
This Kat did not have time to get round to reading Hospira v Genentech when it first emerged, and did not immediately notice that it was an entire new case in its own right, and not simply a codicil to the decision that he reported here. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
