Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 1821 - 1840 of 120,408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2018, 7:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Purpose has to be assessed use by use, even though that may be difficult. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 4:18 am
In September, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled in Celine SARL v Celine SA that use of a brand as a shop name does not necessarily infringe an identical brand covering goods. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm by Justin Hendrix
Murthy v Missouri may become a landmark Supreme Court case in which the justices are led astray on the basis of a disinformation-laden record. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:13 am
Consumers, knowing that the use permitted by such regulations is very limited, have only a limited interest in buying that product (Case C-110/05 Commission v. [read post]
US Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas wrote a six-page concurring opinion for the Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari Monday in Seattle’s Union Gospel Mission v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:07 pm
The prosecutor used a term and the jury didn't know what it meant. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:49 am
Tomorrow the US Supreme Court will hear argument in Watson v. [read post]
  If you used Uber and paid for your own ride, please contact us regarding any potential claims you may have. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:54 am by Jeff Welty
The increasing use of presentments may have led the defense bar to focus more on presentments than it had previously. [read post]