Search for: "MILLER v. U.S."
Results 1821 - 1840
of 2,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2006, 4:42 pm
In 1973, the Supreme Court attempted to define obscenity in Miller v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005), holding death sentences for juveniles violated the Eighth Amendment; Miller v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
Those two cases are the consecutively numbered Miller v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
” In contrast, he continued, the “bureaucracy at the U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:50 am
(Miller v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 7:16 am
Ever since the U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
The U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 4:39 am
In Matter of Murphy v U.S. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 10:53 am
Moore v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
, 296 F.3d 376, 378 (5th Cir. 2002)(quoting Miller v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In one case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 7:25 am
Koester v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 6:26 am
Hinton v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
The court of appeals vacated the sentence, concluding that the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard by focusing on the nature of the offense and not whether the defendant was, within the meaning of Miller v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
"Miller-El v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 5:26 am
Trump v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 11:05 am
Ferriero, the U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:13 am
The Federal Circuit noted that the law of broadening reissues was first developed by the Supreme Court in the 1881 decision Miller v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 10:31 am
A grant would appear to be quite likely, because there is a definite conflict among the Circuit Courts on the meaning of the Second Amendment, and the Supreme Court has not ruled on the issue since a somewhat ambiguous decision in 1939 (U.S. v. [read post]
