Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 19,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 10:23 am
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 11:21 am
Quinn and Friedrichs v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 4:19 am
State Permits, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 4:01 am
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:06 am
VIP therefore was entitled to judgment in its favor on the federal and state law dilution claims. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 2:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
Further, the Court stated that it is an established principle of settled case-law that, as a general rule, the submission of facts and evidence by the parties remains possible after the expiry of the relevant time limits, and the EUIPO is not prohibited from taking account of such facts and evidence (mobile.de v EUIPO, C‑418/16 P).In this case, it was accepted by both parties that Mr Noah had submitted the first evidence of use of the Mark within the time limit… [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:22 am
for participation, by an act occurred in another Member State (Member State B), in violation of trade mark rights committed in the first Member State (Member State A )? [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 4:26 pm
Justice Heald, in the case of Schenley Distilleries Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 2:50 am
Larry Lessig and Mark Meckler. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:27 pm
") Rhino Sports v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:14 am
EMAIL FROM JUDGE MARK BENNETT TO COUNSEL IN WATERMAN V. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
In McCallum Industries Ltd. v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:46 am
Embarcadero Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:49 pm
Australia’s High Court famously left the door open for a possible privacy tort in the ABC v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:49 am
Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board and Mark Dreher. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:24 pm
SEC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 12:40 pm
Mark v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 3:07 am
American University v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
Briefly: In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews next week’s oral argument in Yates v. [read post]
