Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
In that case, V.L. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:48 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:26 am
Pardon the Jimi Hendrix allusion, but it seemed appropriate given yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:26 am
Pardon the Jimi Hendrix allusion, but it seemed appropriate given yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am
Judge Walton also flags a previous order regarding potential non-compliance by FBI in its storage standards for raw data, but concludes that remedial action taken by the FBI appears to be sufficient to allow certification. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court declined to hear Lenz. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court said in Riley v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:55 am
In my Internet Law casebook, I include People v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Dunn, the court found that Alabama had denied a death-penalty defendant the expert mental-health assistance to which he was entitled under the standard the court established in Ake v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
., v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:26 pm
Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Ltd v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
We apply this “clearly established” standard “across the board” and without regard to “the precise nature of the various officials’ duties or the precise character of the particular rights alleged to have been violated. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm
In his opinion for the court, Justice Stephen Breyer started with common ground for both sides: the Court’s 1985 decision in Ake v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:51 am
The “red flag” knowledge standard in US law is certainly far from crystal clear, but such knowledge can never be presumed. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 6:05 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 2:22 am
It had to apply the factors set out in cases such as Axel Springer v Germany ([2012] ECHR 227,[89] to [95]). [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
In Haig v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
In Sessions v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:17 pm
Accardi v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:01 am
Precisely how are certification marks obtained, students asked, and how closely does the PTO scrutinize the chosen standard? [read post]
